Volume 25, Issue 4 (11-2017)                   Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care 2017, 25(4): 95-103 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Cheraghi F, Afshari Z, Tapak L, Sabouri T, Sadeghian E. The Effect of Mothers’ Voice on Preterm Neonates’ Physiological Parameters. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care 2017; 25 (4) :95-103
URL: http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-1683-en.html
The Effect of Mothers’ Voice on Preterm Neonates’ Physiological Parameters
Fatemeh Cheraghi1 , Zahra Afshari2 , Leili Tapak3 , Tahereh Sabouri4 , Efat Sadeghian * 5
1- Chronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Chronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , sadeghianefat@gmail.com
Abstract:   (8059 Views)
Introduction: Favorable auditory stimulation improves the preterm neonates’ physiological function. Thus this study investigates the effect of mothers’ Voice on preterm  neonates’ physiological  parameters.  
Methods: This one group, pre-post-test clinical trial was conducted in NICU of Mehr Hospital in Malayer, 2016. Thirty-six preterm neonates with gestational age (32-37 weeks) and birth aged 3-28 days were selected by simple random sampling. The mother of each neonate talked with her own baby for ten minutes in three days whispering. Arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were measured three times, 5 minutes before, 10 minutes within and 5 minutes after intervention each day. Data was analyzed using SPSS22 and descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation and analysis of variance with repeated measures and Tukey multiple comparison tests. Confidence level was 0.95.
Results: The mean SpO2, RR and HR values were significantly difference between three times of measurement in each day (P<0.001). According to Tukey test, the mean SpO2 values increased and Mean RR and HR values decreased between three times of measurement in each day.
Conclusion: The live whisper of own mother improves the physiological parameters of the preterm neonate. SpO2 increased, HR and RR decreased. Therefore, in daily nursing care planning, the nurses can give the mothers time to talk to their babies.
Keywords: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Preterm Infants, Live Voice, Physiological Responses
Persian Full-Text [PDF 274 kb]   (1703 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2017/02/16 | Accepted: 2017/04/12 | Published: 2017/07/17
References
1. Eskandari N, Keshavars M, Jahdi F, Ashaieri H, Hoseini F, Kalani M.The effect of holly quran recitation on physiological responses of premature infant. koomesh. 2010;11(3):169-77.
2. Hoffenkamp H, Hall R, Croon M, Braeken J. The impact of premature child birth on prenatal bonding. Evoluationary Psychology. 2012; 10(3): 542-61. [DOI] [PubMed]
3. Morisaki N, Togoobaatar G, Vogel J, Souza J, Rowland Hogue C, Jayaratne K, et al. Risk factors for spontaneous and provider‐initiated preterm delivery in high and low human development index countries: a secondary analysis of the world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. British Journal of Obstertrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(1):101-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
4. Mansourghanaei M. Seasonal pattern of preterm birth. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2011;20(79):77-83.
5. Chiejina E, Ebenebe R, Odira C, Okeke J, Orji I, Osuala E. At risk infants in nicu: parental stress related factors. Ind J Sci Res and Tech. 2015;3(1):6-11.
6. Filippa M, Devouche E, Arioni C, Imberty M, Gratier M. Live maternal speech and singing have beneficial effects on hospitalized preterm infants. Acta Paediatrica. 2013;102(10):1017-20. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Hockenberry M, Wilson D. Wongs Nursing Care of Infants and Children. 10nd ed. Vol 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014.
8. Kattwinkel J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 6nd ed. Vol 1. USA: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2011.
9. Kliegman RM, Stanton B, Geme JS, Schor NF, Behrman RE. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 20th ed. Vol 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
10. Gomella Tl. Neonatology: management procedures on cell problem disease and drug. 7nd ed. Vol 1. New York: Elsevier; 2009.
11. fanarrof AA, martin A. Neonatal –perinatal medicine. 9nd ed. Vol 2. Philadelphia : mosby; 2010.
12. Gonrad Al, Richard man L, Lindgren S, Nopoulos P. Biological and environment predictors of behavioral sequela in children born preterm. pediatric. 2010;125(1):83-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Szczepanski M, Kamianowska M. Evaluation of noise in the neonatal intensive care. Perinatal Medicine. 2008;14(4):37-40.
14. Wachman EM, Lahav A. The effect of noise preterm infant in the NICU. Archives of disease in childhood fetal and neonatal. edition .2011;96(4):305-309. [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Kruger C, Wall S, Parker L, Nealis S. Exposure to maternal voice in preterm infants: a review. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2010;10(1):13-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
16. Standly J. Music therapy research in the NICU. An updated meta analysis neonatal network. Neonatal Netw. 2012;31(5):311-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. Turnage CS, papile LA. Developmental supportive care. Manual of neonatal care. 8nd ed. philadelpia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
18. Hodgest AL, Wilson LL. Preterm infants responses to music:An integrative literature review. South Online J Nurs Res. 2010;10(3):1-16.
19. Doheny L, Hurvitz SH, Insoft R, Ringer S, Lava A. Expouser to biological maternal sounds improvs cardio respiratory regulation in extremely preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(9):1591-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
20. Caskey M, Stephens B, Tucker R, Vohr B. Adult talk in the NICU with preterm infants and developmental outcomes. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):e578-e84. [DOI] [PubMed]
21. Beauchemin M, Gonzalez-Frankenbergae B, Tremblay J, Vannasing P, Maternz-Montes E, Belin P,etal. Mother and Stranger:An electrophysiological study of voice processing in newborns. Cerebral Cortex Advance Acess. 2010;21(8):1705-11. [DOI] [PubMed]
22. Bozzett M. Healthy preterm infants response to taped maternal voice. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(4):304-3. [DOI]
23. Fillipa M, Frassoldati R, Talucci F. Mothers singing and speaking to preterm infants in NICU. J Pediatr Neonat Individual Med. 2015;4(2):402-38.
24. Mohamad zadeh M. Evaluating the impact of recorded maternal Voice on physiological responses of preterm infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. [PHD thesis]. Tehran: University of Medical Science of Tehran; 2014.61-8.
25. Keshavars M, Eskandari N, Jahdi F, Ashaieri H, Hoseini F, Kalani M. The effect of holly Quran recitation on physiological responses of premature infant. Koomesh. 2010;11(3):169-77.
26. Jebraeilli M, Sabet, Mustafa G, Gharebagi M, Asgarri M.The effect of recorded mums lullaby and brahams lullaby on oxygen saturation in preterm infant. Journal of Caring Sciences. 2016;5(1):85-95. [DOI] [PubMed]
27. Farhat A, Amiri R, Karbandi S, Esmaily H, Mohamadzadeh A. The Effect of listening to lullaby music on physiologic response and weight gain of premature infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2010;3(2):103-7.
28. Picciolini O, Porro M, Meazza A, Lorella Giannì M, Rivoli C, Lucco G, Barretta F, Bonzini M, Mosca F. Early exposure to maternal voice: Effects on preterminfants development. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(2):287-92. [DOI] [PubMed]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb