Volume 26, Issue 1 (4-2018)                   Sci J Hamadan Nurs Midwifery Fac 2018, 26(1): 19-25 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Varaei S, Afshar Nasr P, Bahrani N, Mohamadi K. The Comparison of the Effects of Electronic Education with Workshop Education on Knowledge of Nursing Students about Patient's Rights. Sci J Hamadan Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2018; 26 (1) :19-25
URL: http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-1711-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Nursing and Midwifery School, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran , shvaraei@tums.ac.ir
2- Master Nursing Student, Nursing and midwifery school, Tehran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Lecturer, Consulting statistic, Faculty member of shahid sattari school, Tehran, Iran
4- Master midwifery student, Nursing and midwifery school, Tehran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1687 Views)

Introduction: Patient's rights are the communication rules  between patients, health staff, and health services.  There are concerns regarding observing the patient's rights including privacy and informed consent on the part of medical personnel. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim to compare electronic and workshop education on knowledge of nursing students about patients’ rights.
Method: This is a semi- experimental study with two groups. 60 nursing students were chosen through simple-random method, and were allocated to electronic and workshop education groups. Educational content about privacy and informed consent were taught to students in a four-hour workshop. The very same content on a compact disk was taught to electronic group. Before and after educational intervention, the students' level of knowledge was assessed with questionnaires and data were analyzed with statistical-analytical tests and SPSS software.
Results: The results showed that the mean level of knowledge in both groups was increased after intervention But in the workshop group it was statistically meaningful (P=0.001)
Conclusion: Nursing students' training is a way to increase the respect for patient’s rights. However, achieving this goal requires educational approaches to provide learning infrastructures to make the nurses ready for patients' care taking  in the future.

Full-Text [PDF 306 kb]   (54 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2017/04/9 | Accepted: 2017/06/10 | Published: 2017/07/17

References
1. Akca SO, Akpinar YY, Habbani T. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses regarding patient rights: a Corum/Turkey sample. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61(5):452-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
2. Aiazi Z, Khosravi N. Law and Nursing Report. 2nd ed. Tehran: Jamehe Negar; 2009.
3. Breen KJ. Medical professionalism: is it really under threat? Med J Aust. 2007;186(11):596-8. [PubMed]
4. Gharamaleki FA. Organizational Responsibility Methodology. Noor Mag. 2002;49:225-36.
5. Binesh M. Obstacles to Growth Professional Ethics in Organizations. Tehran: Sanat Khodro; 2012.22-7.
6. Rahmdel M. Human right to privacy. Law and Political Science .2006:70;119-47.
7. Aghajani M, Dehghannayeri N. The rate of observe "various dimensions of Patients Privacy" by treatment team. Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2009;2(1):59-70.
8. Sugarman J. Ethics in primary Care. New York: McGrow-Hill.Pub; 2000.247.
9. Bagheri A. Iranian medical ethics priorities: the results of a national study. Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2011;4(5):39-48.
10. Ansari B. Privacy and protection of the rights of Islam, comparative and Iran. Journal of law and political science university. 2005;66(1):1-53.
11. Bayrami R, Pezeshki M, Ebrahimi M. A Study of the influence of implementing patients' rights workshop for midwives on the women's viewpoint about parturient rights respect. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac, 2007;5(3):93-101.
12. Bostani Khalesi Z, Masole S, Abedinzade M. Evaluation of the Patients, Doctors and Nurses View Points about Patient Bill of Rights in Rasht Public Hospitals. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2012;2(2):91-5
13. Johnstone M-J. Nursing ethics and informed consent. Aust Nurs Midwifery J. 2011;19(5):29.
14. Parsapoor M B, Ghasemzadeh S R. Legal and jurisprudential study of patient`s informed consent and physician`s duty of notification: a comparison between Iranian, English and French law. Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2011;5(1):39-50
15. Bjørk IT, Romyn DM. What constitutes a nursing practical skill? West J Nurs Res. 1999;21(1):51-63. [DOI] [PubMed]
16. Mallaber C, Turner P. Competency versus hours: An examination of a current dilemma in nurse education. Nurs Edus Today. 2006;26(2):110-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. Abbaszadeh A, Abedi HA, Ghofrani F, Sharif F. Design and evaluation of ethical nursing
18. practice model. Teb va Tazkiyeh. 2002;11(47):59-66.
19. Mahmoodi Shan G, Alhani F, Ahmadi F, Kazemnejad A. Ethics in nurses, lifestyle: a qualitative study. Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009;2(4):63-78.
20. Shahsavari Isfahani S, Mosallanejad L, Sobhanian S. The effect of virtual and traditional methods on students learning and competency – based skills. Hormozgan Med J. 2010;14(3):184-90.
21. Jesri M. Review on Islamic point of view about informed consent in pediatric medicine. Ethics in science and Technology. 2007;1(1):41-7.
22. Heidari M, Anooshe M, Azadarmaki T, Mohammadi E. The Process of Patient's Privacy: A Grounded Theory. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2011;19(5):644-54.
23. Zolfaghari M, Mehrdad N, Parsa Yekta Z, Salmani Barugh N, Bahrani N. The Effect of Lecture and E-learning Methods on Learning Mother and Child Health Course in Nursing Students. Iran J Med Educ. 2007;7(1):31-9.
24. Blinco K, Mason J, McLean N, Wilson S. Trends and issues in E-learning infrastructure Development. Marseille: Alt-i-lab; 2004.
25. Della Corte F, La Mura F, Petrino R. E-learning as educational tool in emergency and disaster medicine teaching. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(5):181-95. [PubMed]
26. Katuk N, Kim G, Ryu H. Experience beyond knowledge: Pragmatic e-learning systems design with learning experience. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(2):747-58. [DOI]
27. Mirbagher Ajorpaz N, Heidari S, Ranjbar N, Afshar M. Assessment Rate of Being Conscious and Quality of Informed Consent Process in Inpatients Undergoing Surgery in Selected Hospitals of Isfahan in 2009. Qom Univ Med Sci J . 2011;5(S1):53-60.
28. Khatoni A, Dehghan Nayery N, Ahmady F, Haghani H. The Effect of Web-Based and Traditional Instructions on Nurses' Knowledge about AIDS. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(2):140-8.
29. Tabet N, Stewart R, Hudson S, Sweeney V, Sauer J, Bryant C, et al. Male gender influences response to an educational package for delirium prevention among older people: a stratified analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(5):493-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
30. Haghani N. Electronic platform capabilities in education (language). Research in Contemporary World Literature. 2004;9(18):39-50.
31. Dargahi H, Ghazi Saidi M, Ghasemi M. The role of e-learning in Medical Sciences Universities. Payavard. 2008;1(2):20-9.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Scientific Journal of Hamadan Nursing & Midwifery Faculty

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb