دوره 29، شماره 2 - ( بهار 1400 )                   جلد 29 شماره 2 صفحات 170-160 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nakhaeizadeh A, Mohammadi S. Assessing the Level of Engagement in Preventive Behaviors and COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Iranian Adults. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care 2021; 29 (2) :160-170
URL: http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-2237-fa.html
نخعی زاده امیرمالک، محمدی سپیده. بررسی میزان رعایت رفتارهای پیشگیرانه و اضطراب ناشی از بیماری کووید 19 در جمعیت بزرگسال ایران. مجله مراقبت پرستاری و مامایی ابن‌سینا. 1400; 29 (2) :160-170

URL: http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-2237-fa.html


1- دانشجوی کارشناسی، دانشکدۀ پرستاری مامایی رامسر، کمیتۀ تحقیقات دانشجویی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل، بابل، ایران
2- استادیار، گروه پرستاری داخلی جراحی، مرکز تحقیقات مراقبت‌های پرستاری، پژوهشکدۀ سلامت دانشکدۀ پرستاری مامایی رامسر، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل، بابل، ایران ، sepidmohamadi@gmail.com
متن کامل [PDF 460 kb]   (2016 دریافت)     |   چکیده (HTML)  (4561 مشاهده)

✅ سیاست‌گذاران نظام سلامت می ‌‌توانند با اطلاع از وضعیت رفتار پیشگیرانۀ عموم مردم و اضطراب تجربه‌‌شدۀ آنان از بیماری و شناسایی افرادِ در‌معرض خطر، برنامه‌‌ریزی مهار بیماری را به‌سمت تأکید بیشتر روی رفتارهای کمتر ‌رعایت ‌شده سوق دهند و اضطراب ناشی از بیماری را به‌سمت مثبت و در مسیر بهبود رفتارهای پیشگیرانه هدایت کنند.


چکیده گسترده انگلیسی:   (1165 مشاهده)
Introduction

The outbreak of Covid-19 virus is a global crisis and engagement of people in preventive behavior against COVID-19 has a key role to stop chains of transmission and adherence to preventive measures can be affected by psychosocial factors. This study aimed at assessing the relationship between the level of adherence to preventive behaviors and COVID-19 related anxiety in Iranian adults.

 

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional correlational study, 1008 Iranian adults were selected by the convenience sampling method. The online questionnaire of Preventive Behavior against COVID-19 and the Corona Anxiety Scale was sent to research participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics and SPSS 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL., USA) at a significance level of 0.05.

 

Results

The average total score of engagement in preventive behavior was 19.47±2.35. Some behaviors such as keeping social distance, wearing masks in public places and staying at home was engaged less than other behaviors. The COVID-19 related anxiety was severe in 22.4% of subjects, moderate in 34.9% of subjects and low in 42.7% of subjects. There was a significant relationship between the preventive behaviors and COVID-19 related anxiety (r=0.203, P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the scores obtained from engagement in preventive behaviors and Anxiety Intensity with demographic variables (P<0.001).
 
 

Discussion

Analysis of the study data showed that the observance of preventive behaviors until mid-May was relatively acceptable and the total mean score was 19.47± 2.35. Coinciding with this study in the United States, a study of public adherence to preventive behaviors in the first week of the COVID-19 epidemic found that most people reported observance of preventive behaviors at an appropriate level [10]. In a study conducted in Iran on 240 medical students, only 5.8% of participants scored low on preventive behaviors, and the researchers cited the level of literacy and greater awareness of this group as one of the reasons for this [22].
Contrary to the results of the present study, a study in Myanmar found that only 22% of the general population's preventive behaviors were acceptable, 45% of participants washed their hands regularly, and 47% always covered their mouth and nose when sneezing or coughing, and only 34% refused to travel. In this study, the reason for the low level of preventive behaviors in Myanmar compared to other countries was the lack of public awareness of coronavirus in this country [23].
According to the results of the present study, behaviors such as observing social distance, masking in public places, not attending parties and gatherings, and not leaving home except for necessary occasions were less observed than other behaviors. In 2006, a study was conducted on the influenza epidemic and the results showed that the level of public perception of the effectiveness of preventive behavior in contracting the disease plays a key role in the observance of preventive behaviors [24]. The effectiveness of behaviors such as masking during the first months of the COVID pandemic was questionable, and health organizations and communities dealt with this contradictory issue; therefore, they can be considered as one of the reasons for weakness in this area.
In addition, qualitative studies in the UK have shown that having adequate, low-cost facilities is very effective in improving preventive behaviors during the pandemic, and during the flu in the UK, the general public due to factors such as lack of masks and disinfectants and lack of space to perform physical distance encountered problems in observing preventive behaviors [25]. Therefore, one of the reasons for the weakness in social distance and masking in public places of the present study can be similar to the study conducted in the UK and factors such as lack of facilities and lack of low-cost equipment for public use in the early stages of the disease.
Analysis of data on COVID-19 anxiety revealed that more than half of the study participants experienced moderate to severe anxiety. In countries such as China, India, Oman and Iran, several studies have examined the psychological state of the general public during the outbreak of COVID -19 and pointed to increased levels of stress, anxiety and distress in this period [14, 16, 26-28]. According to a study conducted in the first month of COVID-19's appearance in Iran, the level of anxiety experienced by the Iranian public was high and moderate, and more than the experienced anxiety of the Chinese people. In this study, factors such as the level of social support were mentioned as effective reasons for anxiety due to the disease [15].
In the present study, there was a significant relationship between the two variables of observance of preventive behaviors and anxiety caused by COVID-19 disease (r = 0.203 and P<0.001). Mean and standard deviation of scores obtained from the scale of preventive behaviors and severity of anxiety caused by COVID-19 were examined separately for demographic variables and the results showed that the mean scores were higher in women aged 50-69 years and retirees and housewives than in other groups.
In line with the present study, a study in the UK noted the positive role of cowardice-induced fear and anxiety in improving preventive behaviors such as hand washing and social distance. The authors of this study considered the existence of an appropriate level of anxiety to improve preventive performance and considered it as an effective and functional fear and anxiety; however, they noted that the experience of fear and anxiety caused by the disease in the long run may have adverse effects on preventive behavior and lead to fatigue and anxiety and psychological crises [29]. In most studies, fatigue due to long-term anxiety is somehow mentioned as an effective factor in not observing preventive behavior [17]. Also, in line with the present study, in several studies conducted during the pandemic in different countries, the results confirmed that the anxiety caused by the disease in women and the elderly was more than other groups [29, 30].

 
 

Conclusion

Being aware of the general state of preventive behavior of the general public and their experienced anxiety about the disease and identifying at-risk individuals, health policy makers can, shift disease control planning to a greater emphasis on less observed behaviors and positively induce disease anxiety and improve preventive behaviors.

 

Acknowledgments

This study was the result of a project approved by the Student Research Committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences under the number IR.MUBABOL.REC.1399.172. We would like to thank all the officials of Babol University of Medical Sciences who have contributed to the approval of this project, as well as all the participants in the research.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no connflict of interest.

 

نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي اصیل | موضوع مقاله: پرستاری
دریافت: 1399/7/7 | پذیرش: 1399/7/28 | انتشار: 1399/10/1

فهرست منابع
1. Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Di Napoli R. Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus [COVID-19]. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
2. Organization WHO. Coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]: situation report, 72. 2020. [Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports. Accessed May 23, 2020
3. Spinelli A, Pellino G. COVID‐19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis. Br J Surg. 2020 Mar 19. [DOI:10.1002/bjs.11627] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Kim PS, Reicin AS. Discontinuation of VIOXX. The Lancet. 2005 Jan 1;365(9453):23. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17652-6]
5. worldmeter. Coronavirus Cases in Iran 2020 [Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/iran/ Accessed May 24, 2020
6. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin D-Y, Chen L, et al. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. Jama. 2020;323[14]:1406-7. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.2565] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, Bosse NI, Jarvis CI, Russell TW, et al. Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group. Funk S, Eggo RM. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr; 8 (4): e488-e496. [DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7]
8. Tuite AR, Bogoch II, Sherbo R, Watts A, Fisman D, Khan K. Estimation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) burden and potential for international dissemination of infection from Iran. Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 19;172(10):699-701. [DOI:10.7326/M20-0696] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Zandifar A, Badrfam R. Iranian mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Mar;51. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101990] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Wise T, Zbozinek TD, Michelini G, Hagan CC. Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
11. Lau JT, Kim JH, Tsui H, Griffiths S. Perceptions related to human avian influenza and their associations with anticipated psychological and behavioral responses at the onset of outbreak in the Hong Kong Chinese general population. American Journal of Infection Control. 2007 Feb 1;35(1):38-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2006.07.010] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Lau JT, Yang X, Tsui H, Kim JH. Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62. J Epidemiology Community Health. 2003 Nov 1;57(11):864-70. [DOI:10.1136/jech.57.11.864] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Lau JT, Tsui H, Kim JH, Griffiths S. Perceptions about status and modes of H5N1 transmission and associations with immediate behavioral responses in the Hong Kong general population. Prevent Med. 2006 Nov 1;43(5):406-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.06.007] [PMID]
14. Huang Y, Zhao N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry research. 2020 Apr 12:112954. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Jahanshahi AA, Dinani MM, Madavani AN, Li J, Zhang SX. The distress of Iranian adults during the Covid-19 pandemic-More distressed than the Chinese and with different predictors. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jan 1. [DOI:10.1101/2020.04.03.20052571]
16. Naser AY, Dahmash EZ, Al-Rousan R, Alwafi H, Alrawashdeh HM, Ghoul I, Abidine A, Bokhary MA, AL-Hadithi HT, Ali D, Abuthawabeh R. Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. medRxiv. 2020 Jan 1. [DOI:10.1101/2020.04.09.20056374]
17. Harper CA, Satchell LP, Fido D, Latzman RD. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of mental health and addiction. 2020 Apr 27. [DOI:10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Brosschot JF, Gerin W, Thayer JF. The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2006 Feb 1;60(2):113-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.074] [PMID]
19. Wenzel L, Glanz K, Lerman C. Stress, coping, and health behavior. Health behavior and health education. 2002 Sep 9;2:210-39.
20. Organization WH. Coronavirus disease [COVID-19] advice for the public 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public. Accessed May 25, 2020
21. Alipour A, Ghadami A, Alipour Z, Abdollahzadeh H,. Preliminary validation of the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale [CDAS] in the Iranian sample. J Health Psycol. 75-16;[32]8.2020. DOI: 10.30473/HPJ.2020.52023.4756
22. Taghrir MH, Borazjani R, Shiraly R. COVID-19 and Iranian Medical Students; A Survey on Their Related-Knowledge, Preventive Behaviors and Risk Perception. Archives of Iranian medicine. 2020 Apr 1;23(4):249-54. [DOI:10.34172/aim.2020.06] [PMID]
23. Mya Kyaw S, Aye SM, Hlaing Win A, Hlaing Su S, Thida A. Awareness, perceived risk and protective behaviours of Myanmar adults on COVID-19. https://www. ijcmph. com/index. php/ijcmph/article/download/6308/3908. 2020. [DOI:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20201530]
24. Rubin GJ, Amlôt R, Page L, Wessely S. Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey. Bmj. 2009 Jul 2;339. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.b2651] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Morrison LG, Yardley L. What infection control measures will people carry out to reduce transmission of pandemic influenza? A focus group study. BMC public health. 2009 Dec;9(1):1-1. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-9-258] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Meng H, Xu Y, Dai J, Zhang Y, Liu B, Yang H. Analyze the psychological impact of COVID-19 among the elderly population in China and make corresponding suggestions. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:112983. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112983] [PMCID]
27. Moghanibashi-Mansourieh A. Assessing the anxiety level of Iranian general population during COVID-19 outbreak. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;51:102076. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102076] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK, Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;51:102083. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102083] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Imtiaz A, Hossain MA, Khan NM. COVID-19 in Bangladesh: Measuring differences in individual precautionary behaviors among young adults. medRxiv. 2020 Jan 1. [DOI:10.1101/2020.05.21.20108704]
30. Bish A, Michie S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British journal of health psychology. 2010 Nov;15(4):797-824. [DOI:10.1348/135910710X485826] [PMID] [PMCID]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به مجله مراقبت پرستاری و مامایی ابن‌سینا است. استفاده غیرتجاری از مطالب وب سایت، با ذکر منبع بلامانع است. 

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق | 

© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |