Volume 27, Issue 4 (10-2019)                   Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care 2019, 27(4): 231-241 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Talebi M, Ahmadi F, Kazemnejad A. Design and Psychometric Properties of Clinical Nurses Time Management Competency Questionnaire. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care 2019; 27 (4) :231-241
URL: http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-1951-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , ahmadif@modares.ac.ir
3- Professors, Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Persian Full-Text [PDF 809 kb]   (1658 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (14366 Views)

The questionnaire, according to its designation, can be used to assess the social components of time management competency of clinical nurses.


Extended Abstract:   (965 Views)
Introduction

In the nursing system, time is the same care [6]. Time management is the most important part of patient care, so time is also the most important factor in better patient management [7]. In nursing evaluation tools, time management is one of the constructs used to assess clinical nurses competency [11, 12]. The challenge in defining and constructing existing time management tools is to disregard social contexts in organizations. These tools do not address social contexts such as work relationships with colleagues, managers, and customers [13]. Nurses throughout the social process decide how to organize their activities [14]. In the nursing system, time management is a complex concept that neglecting others, the team and the organization and neglecting them will lead to the continuity of individualism and individual time management perspective [15]. ؛ Therefore, given the lack of dedicated tools for assessing the competence of time management based on the social components of clinical nurses, the lack of dedicated tools is tailored to the job characteristics of the clinical nursing community, social processes, and culture influenced by the nursing field.

 

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted using a sequential heuristic approach [20]. Regarding the neglect of social processes in the existing public time management tools and related to the context of time management competence, a qualitative study was carried out using Grounded Theory. For this purpose, 21 face-to-face interviews were conducted with 21 participants. Strauss and Corbin 2008 version [21] were used to analyze the qualitative data. In the development phase, the four-step model of Waltz et al. (2010) tool construction was used, which included conceptual model selection, measurement goal setting, initial design formulation and measurement tool construction [22]. In the judgment step, quantitative face validity was first assessed by item impact factor using 10 subjects and then qualitative face validity was performed by 5 subjects. In qualitative formal validity, ambiguities and difficulties in understanding words, misinterpretations, difficulty, appropriateness of the item for the purpose of the tool, and in quantitative face validity, the importance of each item or impact factor was retained or eliminated in the target group [23]. [Next, using 5 experts to assess content validity, according to Hynes criteria, content quality validation was first performed [25]. Quantitative content validity was then measured using two methods of content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) using the opinions of 13 nursing instrumentation and management experts.
Finally, exploratory factor analysis was performed for construct validity. Impact coefficients of the items with values ​​higher than 1.5, validity ratio higher than 0.531 and content validity index content higher than 0.79 were the criteria used in this study [26]. Prior to entering the construct validity step, the items were analyzed for their validity. In the exploratory factor analysis stage, sampling was made available. 478 questionnaires were completed for construct validity. In order to analyze the data at the beginning of factor analysis, the appropriate adequacy index was measured in the Kesser, Meier, and Alkin (KMO) samples with a value between zero and one variable [30]. To determine whether the obtained correlation matrix is ​​significantly different from zero and based on it is justifiable factor analysis, the Bartlett Spearman test was used. If the null hypothesis is rejected in this test, the factorization is justified [31]. After this step, factors were extracted. At this point, variables that are highly correlated are grouped into one category or factor. The factor load of each query in the rotated matrix should not be less than 0.3 and preferably higher [32]. In this study, an index of 0.3 was considered. In order to determine the number of factors, the pebble diagram method was used based on Cattell's theory [33-34]. In addition to determining the number of factors based on the pebble diagram, a variance of more than 5% was used to determine the number of tool factors [35]. After extracting the factors of each of them based on the variables (expressions) of each naming factor and the degree of their compatibility with the concepts and dimensions of time management. According to the Three Indicator Rule, at least 3 items were assigned per hidden variable [36]. Convergence with the basic study theory (qualitative step) was also considered in the process of determining the number and naming of factors [37]. Since the assumption of normality was not established in the initial questionnaire data, factor analysis was performed to determine the validity of the original questionnaire based on Factor Principal Axis and the Promax rotation was used assuming correlation of factors. Using 50 subjects, Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency and test-retest (intra-cluster correlation coefficient) was used to check the consistency of the questionnaire.


 

Results

A total of 41 quotes from the qualitative step quotes were included in the study. Among these items, 37 items were entered into the item analysis after calculating face validity and content validity indices (CVI = 0.9696). Finally, 36 items entered the exploratory factor analysis process. The Kaiser-Meier-Alkin sampling index was 0.886. Accordingly, appropriate sampling of variables was done based on pairwise correlation and their partial correlation. Also, the null hypothesis of data validity was rejected (P <0.05). Therefore, it was concluded that exploratory factor analysis would provide a suitable model for the present data and that the feasibility and probability factorization were sufficient to predict the factors. At this stage, starting from the factor analysis process, items dropped from 36 to 29 items. These items were grouped into 6 factors: responsibility discipline and norms, professional discipline, emotion management, transfer of experiences, task sharing, and managing the demands of others using the grit diagram method and at least 5% variance criterion. Using the above questionnaire, we can predict 46/714th percentile of total time management changes based on social components of clinical nurses. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-cluster correlation coefficient of the questionnaire were 0.858 and 0.906, respectively.

 

Conclusion

Time management has a dynamic and demanding nature. Clinical nurses save time, prevent time wastage, make better use of time, and potential support resources available through action management and social responses, including adjusting responsibilities and norms, professional discipline, managing emotions, transferring experiences, sharing work and managing requests. Others, in the short or long term, manage their time / tasks and, as appropriate, manage the time / tasks of their colleagues to perform assigned tasks to the nursing team. Since the results of this study were derived from clinical nurses, nursing managers can more confidently use these results to teach time management concepts based on social interactions. This questionnaire can be used to evaluate the competency of clinical nurses' time management in nursing research and clinical nursing system operational units.

 

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the participants for their generous contribution of their views, experiences and time.

 

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

 

Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2018/11/5 | Accepted: 2018/12/11 | Published: 2019/03/27

References
1. Henly SJ, editor. Routledge international handbook of advanced quantitative methods in nursing research. Routledge; 2015 Jul 24. [DOI:10.4324/9781315882307] [DOI:10.4324/9781315882307]
2. Peterson SJ, Bredow TS, editors. Middle range theories: application to nursing research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
3. Garcia SD, Gil RB, Haddad MD, Vannuchi MT, da Costa DB. The role of a nurse in the management of medical-hospital material: an integrative review. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2013;12(2):411-26. [DOI:10.5935/1676-4285.20133791] [DOI:10.5935/1676-4285.20133791]
4. Elm ZM, SAA, Bagheri H, Marefat D. Relationship individual and organizational skills, time management sport managers in Khuzestan province. Journal of Research in Sport Management and motor behavior. 2013;3(5):73-83.
5. Chan EA, Jones A, Wong K. The relationships between communication, care and time are intertwined: a narrative inquiry exploring the impact of time on registered nurses' work. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013 Sep;69(9):2020-9. [DOI:10.1111/jan.12064] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/jan.12064] [PMID]
6. Jones TL. A holistic framework for nursing time: implications for theory, practice, and research. InNursing forum 2010 Jul (Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 185-196). Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2010.00180.x] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2010.00180.x] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Klemenc‐Ketis Z, Kravos A, Poplas‐Susič T, Švab I, Kersnik J. New tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioner in primary care settings. Journal of clinical nursing. 2014 May;23(9-10):1323-31. [DOI:10.1111/jocn.12377] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/jocn.12377] [PMID]
8. Dehghan Nayeri N, Nazari AA, Salsali M, Ahmadi F, Adib Hajbaghery M. Iranian staff nurses' views of their productivity and management factors improving and impeding it: a qualitative study. Nursing & health sciences. 2006;8(1):51-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00254.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00254.x] [PMID]
9. König CJ, Kleinmann M. Time management problems and discounted utility. The Journal of Psychology. 2007 May 1;141(3):321-34. [DOI:10.3200/JRLP.141.3.321-336] [PMID] [DOI:10.3200/JRLP.141.3.321-336] [PMID]
10. Taslimi MS, Sherafat A, Ershadifar A. An evaluation of a managing director's performance in an organization in terms of time. Iranian Journal of Management Studies. 2014 Jul 1;7(2):223-42.
11. Scott K, White K, Johnson C, Roydhouse JK. Knowledge and skills of cancer clinical trials nurses in Australia. Journal of advanced nursing. 2012 May;68(5):1111-21. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05816.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05816.x] [PMID]
12. Liou SR, Cheng CY. Developing and validating the Clinical Competence Questionnaire: A self-assessment instrument for upcoming baccalaureate nursing graduates. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2014 Feb 1;4(2):56. [DOI:10.5430/jnep.v4n2p56] [DOI:10.5430/jnep.v4n2p56]
13. Claessens BJ, Van Eerde W, Rutte CG, Roe RA. A review of the time management literature. Personnel review. 2007 Feb 13;36(2):255-76. [DOI:10.1108/00483480710726136] [DOI:10.1108/00483480710726136]
14. Jones TL, Yoder LH. Dimensions of nurse work time: Progress in instrumentation. Nursing & health sciences. 2015;17(3):323-30. [DOI:10.1111/nhs.12191] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/nhs.12191] [PMID]
15. Waterworth S. Time management strategies in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;43(5):432-40. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02740.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02740.x] [PMID]
16. Macan T, Gibson JM, Cunningham J. Will you remember to read this article later when you have time? The relationship between prospective memory and time management. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010 Apr 1;48(6):725-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.015] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.015]
17. Mirzaei T, Oskouie F, Rafii F. Nursing students' time management, reducing stress and gaining satisfaction: a grounded theory study. Nursing & health sciences. 2012 Mar;14(1):46-51. [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00661.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00661.x] [PMID]
18. Montezeli JH, Peres AM, Bernardino E. Nurse management skills required at an emergency care unit. Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online. 2013;5(3):245-52. [DOI:10.9789/2175-5361.2013v5n3p245] [DOI:10.9789/2175-5361.2013v5n3p245]
19. Oskouie sF, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Dabbaghi F, Karimi Moneghi H, Bionghi T. Teaching Styles in Clinical Nursing Education: A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. 2009;15(4):182-91.
20. Creswell JW, Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications; 2017 Aug 31.
21. Corbin J, Strauss A. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 2008.
22. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, al. E. Psychometric properties of health-related measures. part 1: translation, development, and content and face validity. Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research. 2017;16(3):343-57.
23. Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Majd HA, Nikanfar A, Ghahramanian A. Details of content validity and objectifying it in instrument development. Nursing Practice Today. 2014;1(3):163-71.
24. Bagheri H, Yaghmaei F, Ashtorabi T, Zayeri F. Psychometric properties of Illness Related Worries Questionnaire (IRWQ) in heart failure patients. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2014;2(1):24-33.
25. Haynes SN, Richard D, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological assessment. 1995 Sep;7(3):238. [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238] [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238]
26. Ebadi A, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M, Zareiyan A, Sharifnia SH, Mojahedi M. Principles of scale development in health science. Tehran: jamee negar. 2017.
27. Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurments in health applied researches. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2015 Mar 15;13(12):1153-70.
28. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER, editors. Measurement in nursing and health research. Springer publishing company; 2010 Apr 17.
29. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. lippincott williams & wilkins; 2005.
30. Reisy L, Ziaee S, Mohamad E. Designing a questionnaire for diagnosis of vaginismus and determining its validity and reliability. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2015 Jun 15;25(125):81-94.
31. Karimi FZ, Zarifnejad G, Abdolahi M, Ali Taghipour A. Surveying the factor structure and reliability of the Persian version of the Jefferson scale of physician empathy-health care provider student version (JSE-HPS). Journal of hayat. 2015 Dec 15;21(3):5-14.
32. Ahmad MM, Alasad JA. Predictors of patients' experiences of nursing care in medical‐surgical wards. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2004 Oct;10(5):235-41. [DOI:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2004.00484.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2004.00484.x] [PMID]
33. Watson R, Thompson DR. Use of factor analysis in Journal of Advanced Nursing: literature review. Journal of advanced nursing. 2006 Aug;55(3):330-41. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03915.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03915.x] [PMID]
34. Burns N, Grove S. The Practice of Nursing Research Conduct, Critique and Utilization Pennsylvania: Saunders; 2006.
35. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
36. Plichta SB, Kelvin EA, Munro BH. Munro s statistical methods for health care research. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013.
37. Carpenter S, Grant AE, Hoag A. Journalism degree motivations: the development of a scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 2016 Mar;71(1):5-27. [DOI:10.1177/1077695814551835] [DOI:10.1177/1077695814551835]
38. Chung YL. Time management strategy, job satisfaction, research productivity, and life satisfaction of university faculty. 1988.
39. Morsy SM. Relationship between time management skills and effective delegation among the head nurses at Assuit university hospitals. AAMJ. 2010 Sep;8(3).
40. Bentil EE, Bentil W. Understanding the help seeking behavior of Accra Polytechnic students: A qualitative approach. Public Health. 2015;5(6):172-85.
41. Kelly P, Tazbir J. Essentials of Nursing Leadership & Management: Cengage Learning; 2013.
42. Bowers BJ, Lauring C, Jacobson N. How nurses manage time and work in long‐term care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001 Feb 18;33(4):484-91. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01686.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01686.x] [PMID]
43. Black BP. Professional Nursing: Concepts & Challenges: Elsevier; 2013.
44. hoseini shamloo. Time management. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2000;13(24):49-56.
45. Distasio AW. Time Management, Leadership Styles, and Selected Demographic Factors of Connecticut School Superintendents 1986.
46. Schriber JB, Gutek BA. Some time dimensions of work: Measurement of an underlying aspect of organization culture. Journal of applied psychology. 1987 Nov;72(4):642. [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.642] [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.642]
47. Pahlevani M, Ebrahimi M, Radmehr S, Amini F, Bahraminasab M, Yazdani M. Effectiveness of stress management training on the psychological well-being of the nurses. Journal of medicine and life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):313.
48. Jex SM, Elacqua TC. Time management as a moderator of relations between stressors and employee strain. Work & Stress. 1999 Apr 1;13(2):182-91. [DOI:10.1080/026783799296138] [DOI:10.1080/026783799296138]
49. Kourmousi N, Darviri C, Varvogli L, Alexopoulos EC. Teacher Stress Inventory: validation of the Greek version and perceived stress levels among 3,447 educators. Psychology research and behavior management. 2015;8:81. [DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S74752] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S74752] [PMID] [PMCID]
50. Lang D. Preventing short-term strain through time-management coping. Work & Stress. 1992 Apr 1;6(2):169-76. [DOI:10.1080/02678379208260351] [DOI:10.1080/02678379208260351]
51. Schuler RS. Managing stress means managing time. Personnel Journal. 1979 Jan 1;58(12):851-4.
52. Litchfield C, Chater K. Can i do everything? Time management in neonatal unit. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The. 2007 Dec;25(2):36.
53. White SM, Riley A, Flom P. Assessment of Time Management Skills (ATMS): A practice-based outcome questionnaire. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 2013 Jul 1;29(3):215-31. [DOI:10.1080/0164212X.2013.819481] [DOI:10.1080/0164212X.2013.819481]
54. Swansburg RC, Swansburg RJ. Introduction to management and leadership for nurse managers. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2002.
55. Khadivar H, Lotfian N. The Time Managementin Ferdowsi's Shahname. Journal of Pedagogic and Lyric in Persian Language and Literature Studies Quarterly. 2014;6(19):143-64.
56. Burt CD, Weststrate A, Brown C, Champion F. Development of the time management environment (TiME) scale. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2010 Aug 17;25(6):649-68. [DOI:10.1108/02683941011056978] [DOI:10.1108/02683941011056978]
57. McCallin AM, Frankson C. The role of the charge nurse manager: a descriptive exploratory study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2010 Apr;18(3):319-25. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01067.x] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01067.x] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb