✅ The present study indicated the beneficial effect of cognitive and behavioral therapy model on the anxiety of pregnant women with constipation, and it is recommended as a non-pharmacological approach to reduce their anxiety.
Anxiety during pregnancy is a special emotional state related with different concerns during pregnancy including infant health and parturition, which is associated with an increased risk of a range of negative consequences for both mother and child. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cognitive and behavioral therapy on the anxiety of mothers with pregnancy constipation.
The present randomized clinical trial, which included 60 pregnant women with gestational age of 10 to 20 weeks referred to two comprehensive urban health services in Takestan during 2019. Subjects were randomly divided into intervention (n=30) and control (n=30) groups. Study tools included the short form of pregnancy-related anxiety questionnaire (PRAQ-17) and a constipation assessment scale in pregnancy. Intervention included 6-week 90-minute consultation sessions (one session each week) for five groups of 6 persons. Follow-up included immediately and one and two months after session completion.
SPSS software version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistical methods were used to provide general information, to compare the two experimental and control groups before the intervention, to compare the intervention and control groups after the intervention, repeated measures test (Chi-square test) was used to compare qualitative variables. Significance level was determined to be less than 0.05.
This study was approved in the Clinical Trial Registration Center of Iran obtaining the code IRCT20181205041852N1 and by ethics committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences with the code IR.QUMS.REC.1397.267.
Variable | Intervention | Control | x2 | P | |||
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||||
Mother age (years) |
16-20 | 7 | 11.7 | 6 | 10.0 | 1.0142 | 0.780 |
21-25 | 6 | 10.0 | 8 | 13.3 | |||
26-30 | 10 | 16.7 | 7 | 11.7 | |||
31-35 | 7 | 11.7 | 9 | 15.0 | |||
Duration of marriage (years) |
0-5 | 15 | 25.0 | 16 | 26.7 | 0.906 | 0.181 |
6-10 | 11 | 18.3 | 8 | 13.3 | |||
11-15 | 2 | 3.3 | 3 | 5.0 | |||
16-20 | 2 | 3.3 | 3 | 5.0 | |||
Mother's education |
Illiterate | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.7 | 1.273 | 0.889 |
High school | 12 | 20.0 | 10 | 16.7 | |||
Diploma | 13 | 21.7 | 13 | 21.7 | |||
BS | 5 | 8.3 | 6 | 10.0 | |||
Income (million Tomans) |
1-2 | 10 | 16.7 | 12 | 20.0 | 4.649 | 0.113 |
2-3 | 18 | 30.0 | 11 | 18.3 | |||
3-4 | 2 | 3.3 | 7 | 11.7 | |||
Insurance | with | 22 | 36.7 | 27 | 45.0 | 2.783 | 0.181 |
without | 8 | 13.3 | 3 | 5.0 | |||
Marital Satisfaction | Very satisfied | 10 | 16.7 | 9 | 15.0 | 0.077 | 0.781 |
Satisfied | 20 | 33.3 | 21 | 35.0 | |||
History of abortion history | has | 9 | 15.0 | 5 | 8.3 | 1.491 | 0.360 |
does not have | 21 | 35.0 | 25 | 41.7 | |||
Type of previous delivery | normal | 7 | 11.7 | 8 | 13.3 | 0.113 | 0.936 |
Cesarean section | 8 | 13.3 | 7 | 11.7 | |||
No history of childbirth | 15 | 25.0 | 15 | 25.0 | |||
Wanting to get pregnant | willingly | 23 | 38.3 | 21 | 35.0 | 0.344 | 0.771 |
Unwillingly | 7 | 11.7 | 9 | 15.0 | |||
Physical activity rate |
Low | 12 | 20.0 | 14 | 23.3 | 1.669 | 0.434 |
medium | 10 | 16.7 | 12 | 20.0 | |||
Much | 8 | 13.3 | 4 | 6.7 | |||
Take iron supplements | Yes | 21 | 35.0 | 22 | 36.7 | 1.273 | 0.771 |
No | 9 | 15.0 | 8 | 12.4 | |||
Vegetable and fruit consumption share (share) | 1-2 | 12 | 20.0 | 14 | 23.3 | 2.064 | 0.598 |
2-3 | 9 | 15.0 | 11 | 18.3 | |||
3-4 | 8 | 13.3 | 5 | 8.3 | |||
Other | 1 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
Vegetable and fruit consumption share (share | 2-4 | 22 | 36.7 | 15 | 25.5 | 3.486 | 0.226 |
4-6 | 7 | 1.71 | 12 | 20.0 | |||
6-8 | 1 | 1.7 | 3 | 5.0 | |||
Night sleep (hours) | >4 | 1 | 1.7 | 1 | 1.7 | 5.784 | 0.195 |
6-4 | 3 | 5.0 | 6 | 10.0 | |||
6-8 | 13 | 21.7 | 7 | 11.7 | |||
8-10 | 8 | 13.3 | 14 | 23.3 | |||
<10 | 5 | 8.3 | 2 | 3.3 |
Variable |
Before intervention | Immediately after the intervention | One month after the intervention | Two months after the intervention | F (P) | ||
Pregnancy Anxiety Index |
control group | M | 84.200 | 83.300 | 75.633 | 87.200 | <0.001 |
SD | 8.433 | 7.278 | 12.438 | 10.340 | |||
Intervention group | M | 79.366 | 58.633 | 52.600 | 59.966 | <0.001 | |
SD | 6.365 | 6.376 | 9.922 | 9.600 | |||
T(P) | 0.015 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
In a study conducted by Karamouzian et al. in 2013, showed that cognitive-behavioral stress management training has been effective in reducing anxiety and depression during pregnancy, which can be said to be consistent with the present study [29]. In a study conducted by Safaralinezhad et al. to investigate the effect of group cognitive-behavioral counseling on depression during pregnancy showed that this counseling model has a significant effect on reducing depression during pregnancy [30]. Although in this study the dependent variable was depression during pregnancy, but since many studies showed that there is a significant relationship between anxiety and depression, it can be said that it was consistent with the present study [31].
Because interventions during pregnancy are always associated with concerns, there were concerns that the use of cognitive-behavioral interventions for the mother was associated with complications until Goodman et al. to perform other psychotherapeutic methods such as cognitive-behavioral therapy. In this study, they concluded that mindfulness as a non-pharmacological method is effective on pregnancy anxiety [33]. Therefore, in the present study, the effect of group counseling based on cognitive-behavioral therapy on anxiety and constipation in pregnant women was investigated.
In their study, Arch et al. found that pregnant women preferred cognitive-behavioral therapy more than non-pregnant women, and that pregnancy status influenced this preference. This may be due to the limited use of medication to treat anxiety in pregnancy [34]. To increase the effectiveness of this intervention, examining cognitive errors and negative automatic thoughts is not enough and it is necessary to pay special attention to irrational and false assumptions and the main beliefs of pregnant women and correct them, as well as their coping skills in dealing with anxiety.
One of the limitations of this study was the fatigue of the samples to participate in counseling sessions, which caused the samples to fall. Also, due to the consultative nature of the intervention, a single-sided blind study was performed.
The present study indicated the beneficial effect of cognitive and behavioral therapy model on the anxiety of pregnant women with constipation, and it is recommended as a non-pharmacological approach to reduce their anxiety.
This study is part of the approved master's thesis in the field of counseling in midwifery with the ID number IR.QUMS.REC.1397.267. We would like to thank the staff of Takestan County Health Network who helped us in this research.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Rights and permissions | |
![]() |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |